IamFreeTonight.com Launches on Facebook

by David Evans on July 2, 2007   in Social Networking

Online Dating Insider delivers cutting-edge insight and commentary on all aspects of the online dating industry. Topics include industry news, site reviews, emerging trends, analysis of dating site features, discussion about safety, finance and other issues important to the online dating market. Don't miss our Startups directory, useful to anyone running dating or social networking sites. Subscribe to the RSS feed (you can subscribe via email as well). Your comments and suggestions for stories are welcomed.

Check out our full suite of dating site consulting services.

IamFreeTonight has launched on Facebook, although I can’t find the service in the applications listing.

Talking about launching HotOrNot on Facebook (which isn’t a dating site IMHO), Markus at Plentyoffish says:

As for growing pageviews via facebook I think that is a mistake for a dating site,  even when they allow advertising you’d make cents on the dollar compared to what you’d make having the visitor on your site.   I couldn’t even create a dating site in facebook that would run with a profit on facebook.  Most of facebooks pageviews aren’t even in the US and you are looking at splitting 5 cent CPM’s with facebook.

Markus is missing the point. Marketing your dating service to another 10+ million people is why dating sites catering to the younger crowd should look into establishing a presence on Facebook.

Markus says paid sites generate about 10% of their revenue from advertising. I personally despise the fact that Match and other paid sites have advertising on them. I’m already paying you over $100 to use your site, and you’re forcing absolute junk ads down my throat? Thankfully we have Firefox ad blockers to take care of that.

Markus says he will convert to a paid dating site in order to get to $100 million a year. I don’t think that’s going to work for him unless he retains a free tier of membership. Just ask WebDate about converting from free to paid.

As I spend more time in various Facebook dating apps, it’s become clear that there needs to be a consensus about how your friends are invited to take advantage of new applications you embed in your profile. Some apps make it easy to invite all or some of your friends, other apps are much more difficult to understand who is going to be invited, let along what the invitation itself looks like.

One thing is certain, Facebook is getting too complicated to use and some of the apps are incredibly compelling and fun to use. Somewhere in the middle lies a killer apps based on open profiles.

Related Posts

  • OkCupid Developing Facebook Application
  • Facebook Matchmaking With Cablight
  • Mini-Review: FaceBook Dating Applications
  • Facebook has 40 Dating Applications
  • Jambool Launches Payments Widget for Facebook Applications

  • { 4 comments… read them below or add one }

    1 Markus July 2, 2007 at 5:01 pm
    webdate at its height was maybe 5-10% of what plentyoffish is today in terms of traffic and they were never even close to being a leader in any market.

    Their other site Fling.com is growing in leaps and bounds and looks to over take AFF in a few months. Its a massive home run.

    Promoting your site to “millions” and going broke doing it isn’t a good business strategy, niether is messing around with your brand.

    2 David Evans July 2, 2007 at 5:23 pm
    Markus, I’m talking about the general problem of losing the majority of your members. The size of the site doesn’t matter except that perhaps you have a better chance of staying afloat due to the sheer amount of pageviews you get.

    You shouldn’t disregard the possibility that tapping into millions of new people could be a great business strategy for some companies.

    Facebook is enjoying the Myspace hype in a new sector, and the app platform is an amazing idea.

    Saying it won’t work before any type of analysis can be performed makes no sense.

    3 This is not a test August 11, 2007 at 1:36 am
    “Markus says he will convert to a paid dating site in order to get to $100 million a year. I don’t think that’s going to work for him unless he retains a free tier of membership. Just ask WebDate about converting from free to paid.”

    … if Markus tries to add a paid tier, won’t Plentyoffish just become a minor version of Match.com. Or worse, be abandoned by its current users who are using it because of the fact that it is 100% free?

    4 trevor wellhung October 13, 2008 at 11:14 pm
    I have to agree – Fling.com has done wonders for the profit level of http://www.slut-dating.com.

    Have a look and pick up some tips – if you use any it would be great if you could give me credit with a link.

    Leave a Comment

    « Back to text comment

    Previous post: Yahoo Updates Dating Platform, Profile Photos

    Next post: Dr. James Houran Debunks Scientific Matching