<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Online Dating Insider &#187; acquisitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/tag/acquisitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/3.0" -->
	<itunes:summary>Online Dating Industry Consulting &amp; Commentary</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Online Dating Insider</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://onlinedating.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Online Dating Industry Consulting &amp; Commentary</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Theoretical Dating Site Acquisition Roundup</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2007/10/theoretical-dating-site-acquisition-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2007/10/theoretical-dating-site-acquisition-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dating Industry Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gannett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2007/10/theoretical-dating-site-acquisition-roundup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samat Mutra had written a five-part series on Web 3.0 &#38; Gannett.
<blockquote>Gannett (GCI) publishes 85 daily newspapers, nearly 1,000 non-daily publications and 23 television stations in the US. In the UK, Gannett publishes 17 daily newspapers and around 300 non-daily publications. Gannettâ€™s popular newspaper USA TODAY with a circulation of 7.3 million is the USâ€™s largest-selling newspaper. USA WEEKEND is a weekly newspaper with a circulation of 2.3 million. The companyâ€™s 23 television channels cover approximately 18% of the US and have a market reach of 20.1 million households. Gannett also operates a number of web sites.</blockquote>
Part 4 mentions online dating industry <a href="http://www.sramanamitra.com/2007/09/27/web-30-gannett-part-4?referer=sphere_related_content" title="Acquisition targets">acquisiton targets</a>. Samat thinks that Gannett should acquire <a href="http://www.okcupid.com/">OkCupid</a>, <a href="http://www.engage.com/">Engage</a>, <a href="http://www.eharmony.com/">eHarmony</a>, or <a href="http://www.meetic.com/">Meetic</a>.

Personally I don't think any of those options are a great fit for Gannett.

OkCupid is in it for the long haul. I can't see Sam Yagan and his people in Manhattan wanting to be controlled <strike>run into the ground</strike> by a global publisher. Doesn't make sense.

<a href="http://www.engage.com/e/board.htm" title="Suneet Wadhwa Engage.com">Suneet Wadhwa's</a> Engage.com model, while quite novel addictive, like OkCupid, is too focused for a broad media play. There are other organizations that might be interested in the members-as-matchmakers business model, which is slowly gaining traction.

Remember when SpringStreet powered many of the largest media portal dating sites? Where are they now? Buried in FriendFinder.

Eharmony: There is no way they can sell now. They have made themselves a business <strike>dug themselves a hole</strike>Â  and they have to focus on execution for the time being. Something tells me that eHarmony is going to be quite a different service in 18 months given the current online dating environment.

Meetic founder Marc Simoncini is in the middle of a battle with Match for dominance in the EU. Would they sell and risk taking their eye off the prize? I don't think so.

I'm surprised that True.com and Plentyoffish weren't mentioned. Speaking of True, while I haven't heard more rumors about the alleged non-payment of advertising, other vendors are getting paid on schedule.
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Samat Mutra had written a five-part series on Web 3.0 &amp; Gannett.</p>
<blockquote><p>Gannett (GCI) publishes 85 daily newspapers, nearly 1,000 non-daily publications and 23 television stations in the US. In the UK, Gannett publishes 17 daily newspapers and around 300 non-daily publications. Gannettâ€™s popular newspaper USA TODAY with a circulation of 7.3 million is the USâ€™s largest-selling newspaper. USA WEEKEND is a weekly newspaper with a circulation of 2.3 million. The companyâ€™s 23 television channels cover approximately 18% of the US and have a market reach of 20.1 million households. Gannett also operates a number of web sites.</p></blockquote>
<p>Part 4 mentions online dating industry <a href="http://www.sramanamitra.com/2007/09/27/web-30-gannett-part-4?referer=sphere_related_content" title="Acquisition targets">acquisiton targets</a>. Samat thinks that Gannett should acquire <a href="http://www.okcupid.com/">OkCupid</a>, <a href="http://www.engage.com/">Engage</a>, <a href="http://www.eharmony.com/">eHarmony</a>, or <a href="http://www.meetic.com/">Meetic</a>.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t think any of those options are a great fit for Gannett.</p>
<p>OkCupid is in it for the long haul. I can&#8217;t see Sam Yagan and his people in Manhattan wanting to be controlled <strike>run into the ground</strike> by a global publisher. Doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engage.com/e/board.htm" title="Suneet Wadhwa Engage.com">Suneet Wadhwa&#8217;s</a> Engage.com model, while quite novel addictive, like OkCupid, is too focused for a broad media play. There are other organizations that might be interested in the members-as-matchmakers business model, which is slowly gaining traction.</p>
<p>Remember when SpringStreet powered many of the largest media portal dating sites? Where are they now? Buried in FriendFinder.</p>
<p>Eharmony: There is no way they can sell now. They have made themselves a business <strike>dug themselves a hole</strike>Â  and they have to focus on execution for the time being. Something tells me that eHarmony is going to be quite a different service in 18 months given the current online dating environment.</p>
<p>Meetic founder Marc Simoncini is in the middle of a battle with Match for dominance in the EU. Would they sell and risk taking their eye off the prize? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised that True.com and Plentyoffish weren&#8217;t mentioned. Speaking of True, while I haven&#8217;t heard more rumors about the alleged non-payment of advertising, other vendors are getting paid on schedule.</p>
                                                                        <p><center>&copy; 2012 - visit <a href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/">Online Dating Insider</a> to view original post.</center></p>                                                      <p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2007/10/theoretical-dating-site-acquisition-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

