Singles Have No Idea Dating Sites Reward Frequent Activity

how about we - more activity benefits usersThe crappy screenshot above shows that dating site HowAboutWe does a good job at letting members know that the more you log in, the more dates you post, the more messages you send, the more they will put you in front of other people.

Many dating sites reward members who send messages (and more importantly respond to, one would hope). However, few are up front about the benefits of being active. Why is this?

Badoo and Are You Interested are more straightforward. The more you pay them, the more often you show up in front of other members. Easy-breezy. Someone should dive into both sites and figure out why Badoo is supposedly approaching $100 million in revenue and AYI is at about a quarter of that.

While both approaches have their merits, I’m more of a fan of activity-based exposure, along with trust and reputation metrics. Organic activity trumps paid exposure when it comes to serious dating, but with the casual dating market getting so large and unruly, expect many more sites to launch based on the Are You Interested/Badoo model. There’s simply too much short-term money to be made churning through millions of horny guys around the world willing to part with $25-$50 a month for potential hook-ups. Although most guys have no intention of meeting with the women on these sites. Its Myspace voyeurism with a paid layer on top. Unless for most everyone, but pretty damn smart given the size of the market.

Question of the week: Dear Lazyweb, someone wrote in to say they had too many ugly people on their dating site, asking if I knew a way skew the site towards better-looking people. Besides buying profiles from BeautifulPeople and a few other possibilities like rejecting certain photos for being to blurry or some other white lie that I’m not entirely comfortable with, how can this site up the hotness factor of their members?

Dating Industry Advisory Services

Are you a dating site startup looking to make a splash or an established player in the marketplace looking for answers? Online Dating Insider Advisory Services focus on product development, revenue generation, site traffic, site reviews and *much* more. Contact us to learn more.

Comments

  1. “There’s simply too much short-term money to be made churning through millions of horny guys around the world willing to part with $25-$50 a month for potential hook-ups. Although most guys have no intention of meeting with the women on these sites….pretty damn smart given the size of the market.”

    Ah – I wouldn’t call that smart. It’s called a scam. None of the profiles are real, and the guys all think they are – how can you in your right mind say that they have no intention of meeting these girls. Just because you know it’s a scam, doesn’t mean they do. Basically these sites are ripping guys off. It’s really sad actually. It’s called stealing.

  2. I sure as hell call milking people out of $100 million dollars smart. Karma-wise its not so hot, but as a business, its brilliant. They have done what absolutely no other dating site was able/willing to do. There is brilliance in even the most nefarious businesses.

    It sucks for the majority of their users though, thats for sure is. Read my previous posts for more on Badoo and you’ll see, I’m firmly on the side of the consumer most of the time.

    The company will be a shell of its former self in a few years, consider it the Myspace of casual dating. But until then, lets see what they come up with for their US launch.

    And don’t forget to go make some fake Facebook profiles and invite yourself to the site. Very interesting what they are doing.

Speak Your Mind

*