<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Dating Industry News March 10, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-310527</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/#comment-310527</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-310524</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/#comment-310524</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that people pay for dating at all.  There are some great free dating sites out there.  I think the new one at http://freedatingscene.com is quite good and it has some fun features like an online dating comic strip, sending sparks, and even matching other members.  And, it is all completely free.  I just don&#039;t think we have to pay for dating at all anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that people pay for dating at all.  There are some great free dating sites out there.  I think the new one at <a href="http://freedatingscene.com" rel="nofollow">http://freedatingscene.com</a> is quite good and it has some fun features like an online dating comic strip, sending sparks, and even matching other members.  And, it is all completely free.  I just don&#8217;t think we have to pay for dating at all anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliot Sykes</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-304880</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliot Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/#comment-304880</guid>
		<description>The virtual gift research from datehookup.com is interesting but maybe not surprising. What might surprise me is how much people pay...any idea how much virtual gifts typically cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The virtual gift research from datehookup.com is interesting but maybe not surprising. What might surprise me is how much people pay&#8230;any idea how much virtual gifts typically cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Brooks</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-304876</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/#comment-304876</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the intro Dave.  I am looking forward to some &quot;healthy banter&quot; with such a vibrant community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the intro Dave.  I am looking forward to some &#8220;healthy banter&#8221; with such a vibrant community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Moorcroft</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-304873</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Moorcroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/03/online-dating-industry-news-march-10-2010/#comment-304873</guid>
		<description>Dave, re: your comment, &quot;I wish Online Personals Watch would stop promoting adultery by writing about it so often. That kind of behavior does not reflect well on their brand or the online dating industry as a whole.&quot;

Amen to that! I am sure you are speaking for the vast majority of us in the online dating space when you say this. I don&#039;t understand why a reputable guy like Mark Brooks would have such a client in the first place. This reflects badly on his brand, as you say.

He&#039;d do well to get rid of the sugar daddy &amp; adult clients, too. I don&#039;t see how his legitimate clients put up with this. Mark?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, re: your comment, &#8220;I wish Online Personals Watch would stop promoting adultery by writing about it so often. That kind of behavior does not reflect well on their brand or the online dating industry as a whole.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen to that! I am sure you are speaking for the vast majority of us in the online dating space when you say this. I don&#8217;t understand why a reputable guy like Mark Brooks would have such a client in the first place. This reflects badly on his brand, as you say.</p>
<p>He&#8217;d do well to get rid of the sugar daddy &amp; adult clients, too. I don&#8217;t see how his legitimate clients put up with this. Mark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

