<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving Compatibility Matching With Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Matchmaking Based on Movies a Feature or Niche Dating Site? &#124; ZikBlog</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-301738</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Matchmaking Based on Movies a Feature or Niche Dating Site? &#124; ZikBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/#comment-301738</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week I mentioned Cinekin, a dating startup that uses movie ratings to match people. Today I was checking out someone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week I mentioned Cinekin, a dating startup that uses movie ratings to match people. Today I was checking out someone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Matchmaking Based on Movies a Feature or Niche Dating Site?</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-301414</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Matchmaking Based on Movies a Feature or Niche Dating Site?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/#comment-301414</guid>
		<description>[...] here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed or receive email updates.&#160;&#160; Last week I mentioned Cinekin, a dating startup that uses movie ratings to match people. Today I was checking out someone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed or receive email updates.&nbsp;&nbsp; Last week I mentioned Cinekin, a dating startup that uses movie ratings to match people. Today I was checking out someone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Ardenghi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-301071</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Ardenghi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/#comment-301071</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave:

The 16PF5 normative personality test available in different languages is a proprietary test, the owner is the IPAT (the Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.) so any dating site should acquire the license to use it (over USD100,000 per year)

Dating sites offering compatibility matching methods had decided:

- to use mostly different free versions of the Big5, like eHarmony, Meetic Affinity, Parship, Be2, PlentyOfFishChemistryPredictor, MyType
OR
- to develop a proprietary test instead like Chemistry, PerfectMatch and others.

Compatibility matching methods has 2 steps: 
1) to measure personality traits or other variables. 
2) to calculate compatibility between prospective mates. 

The Big5 models personality with 5 variables, and the 16PF5 with 16 variables.

Using Sten scores (Standard Ten)
The Ensemble of the Big5 is 10*10*10*10*10 == 10E5 so it is possible to use simple/multiple linear/logistic regression equations to calculate compatibility between prospective mates
and
The Ensemble of the 16PF5 is 10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10 == 10E16 a very big number as All World Population is nearly 6.7 * 10E9  so it needs a more powerful quantitative method than simple/multiple linear/logistic regression equations to calculate compatibility.



-------------------------------------------------------------------

* Actual online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods, when calculating compatibility between prospective mates, have less or at least the same precision as searching on one&#039;s own. [in the range of 3 or 4 persons compatible per 1,000 persons screened]
* That is because they use:
a) simplified versions of personality traits, instead of the 16PF5 or similar with the complete inventory (16 variables) 
b) inadequate quantitative methods to calculate compatibility between prospective mates, like eHarmony which uses Dyadic Adjustment Scale or other sites which use multivariate linear / logistic regression equations o other equations.

To solve that problem I propose:
*) the 16PF5 or similar normative personality test to measure personality of normal persons over 26 years old interested in serious dating. 


*) a new quantitative method to calculate compatibility between prospective mates, based on quantized pattern comparison (part of pattern recognition by correlation) named LIFEPROJECT method.
The value of my algorithm is to achieve far more precision than searching on one&#039;s own [in the range of 3 persons compatible per 100,000 persons screened, 100 times better than actual competitors]



Kindest Regards.

Fernando Ardenghi. 
Buenos Aires. 
Argentina. 
ardenghifer@gmail.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave:</p>
<p>The 16PF5 normative personality test available in different languages is a proprietary test, the owner is the IPAT (the Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.) so any dating site should acquire the license to use it (over USD100,000 per year)</p>
<p>Dating sites offering compatibility matching methods had decided:</p>
<p>- to use mostly different free versions of the Big5, like eHarmony, Meetic Affinity, Parship, Be2, PlentyOfFishChemistryPredictor, MyType<br />
OR<br />
- to develop a proprietary test instead like Chemistry, PerfectMatch and others.</p>
<p>Compatibility matching methods has 2 steps:<br />
1) to measure personality traits or other variables.<br />
2) to calculate compatibility between prospective mates. </p>
<p>The Big5 models personality with 5 variables, and the 16PF5 with 16 variables.</p>
<p>Using Sten scores (Standard Ten)<br />
The Ensemble of the Big5 is 10*10*10*10*10 == 10E5 so it is possible to use simple/multiple linear/logistic regression equations to calculate compatibility between prospective mates<br />
and<br />
The Ensemble of the 16PF5 is 10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10 == 10E16 a very big number as All World Population is nearly 6.7 * 10E9  so it needs a more powerful quantitative method than simple/multiple linear/logistic regression equations to calculate compatibility.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>* Actual online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods, when calculating compatibility between prospective mates, have less or at least the same precision as searching on one&#8217;s own. [in the range of 3 or 4 persons compatible per 1,000 persons screened]<br />
* That is because they use:<br />
a) simplified versions of personality traits, instead of the 16PF5 or similar with the complete inventory (16 variables)<br />
b) inadequate quantitative methods to calculate compatibility between prospective mates, like eHarmony which uses Dyadic Adjustment Scale or other sites which use multivariate linear / logistic regression equations o other equations.</p>
<p>To solve that problem I propose:<br />
*) the 16PF5 or similar normative personality test to measure personality of normal persons over 26 years old interested in serious dating. </p>
<p>*) a new quantitative method to calculate compatibility between prospective mates, based on quantized pattern comparison (part of pattern recognition by correlation) named LIFEPROJECT method.<br />
The value of my algorithm is to achieve far more precision than searching on one&#8217;s own [in the range of 3 persons compatible per 100,000 persons screened, 100 times better than actual competitors]</p>
<p>Kindest Regards.</p>
<p>Fernando Ardenghi.<br />
Buenos Aires.<br />
Argentina.<br />
<a href="mailto:ardenghifer@gmail.com">ardenghifer@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-301053</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/#comment-301053</guid>
		<description>Mathematics are irrelevant if the matching system is not Valid...   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathematics are irrelevant if the matching system is not Valid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-301023</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/#comment-301023</guid>
		<description>Fernando did you ever stop to think why dating sites don&#039; use the testt? I would like to hear why this test is not being used. What are the downsides to the test? Too short, too long, accuracy issues that you&#039;re not discussing, etc?  Is there a possibility that this test is *not* good for dating sites? 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fernando did you ever stop to think why dating sites don&#8217; use the testt? I would like to hear why this test is not being used. What are the downsides to the test? Too short, too long, accuracy issues that you&#8217;re not discussing, etc?  Is there a possibility that this test is *not* good for dating sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Ardenghi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-301021</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Ardenghi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/01/improving-compatibility-matching-with-movies/#comment-301021</guid>
		<description>
The 16PF First Edition is from 1949.

The 16PF Fifth Edition, 16PF5 is from 2004.

The 16PF5 is a normative test available in:
 Afrikaans
 Chinese - Traditional 
 Czech  
 Danish 
 Dutch 
 English for Australia
 English for Canada
 English for India
 English for South Africa
 English for the United Kingdom
 English for the United States
 Filipino 
 French (European) 
 German 
 Greek 
 Italian 
 Japanese 
 Norwegian 
 Portuguese (European and New World) 
 Portuguese of Brazil 
 Slovak 
 Spanish (Castilian) 
 Spanish-American
 Swedish 
 Turkish 


WorldWide, there are  over 5,000 -five thousand- online dating sites .........  but no one is using the 16PF5 to assess personality of their members!



Kindest Regards.
Fernando Ardenghi. 
Buenos Aires. 
Argentina. 
ardenghifer@gmail.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 16PF First Edition is from 1949.</p>
<p>The 16PF Fifth Edition, 16PF5 is from 2004.</p>
<p>The 16PF5 is a normative test available in:<br />
 Afrikaans<br />
 Chinese &#8211; Traditional<br />
 Czech<br />
 Danish<br />
 Dutch<br />
 English for Australia<br />
 English for Canada<br />
 English for India<br />
 English for South Africa<br />
 English for the United Kingdom<br />
 English for the United States<br />
 Filipino<br />
 French (European)<br />
 German<br />
 Greek<br />
 Italian<br />
 Japanese<br />
 Norwegian<br />
 Portuguese (European and New World)<br />
 Portuguese of Brazil<br />
 Slovak<br />
 Spanish (Castilian)<br />
 Spanish-American<br />
 Swedish<br />
 Turkish </p>
<p>WorldWide, there are  over 5,000 -five thousand- online dating sites &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;  but no one is using the 16PF5 to assess personality of their members!</p>
<p>Kindest Regards.<br />
Fernando Ardenghi.<br />
Buenos Aires.<br />
Argentina.<br />
<a href="mailto:ardenghifer@gmail.com">ardenghifer@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

