If that were true i would be more inclined towards online dating. In “Coming of Age in Samoa” Marget Mead wrote that even while sexual freedom was prevalent in Samoan culture, the Samoan men all replied “Oh women just want to be raped and they aren’t worth trouble.” So what’s wrong with a woman who wants a “man in a can”?

Having said that i would like to thank you, your post has convinced me not to bother

Best Wishes

Crazy Pete

My original reason for opposing it, is just the idea of telling men to sit back, and wait for someone to message them… AND PAY For this service. That and the fact that the site even admits it has a high male to female ration…ensuring that women have the “pick of the litter”, and men… well, they will be lucky to even be messaged *ONCE*.

Online dating is a load of BS anyway – women won’t TALK to you. They are cynical as anything and all want instant man-inna-can, deciding from a photo and some pithy little profile whether you’re mate material instead of talking to and getting to know someone. It’s not like there’s pressure to meet or to exchange phone numbers. Places like eharmony are about as safe as they get with their overbearing cyber chaperone schtick.
Yeah, most women I try to communicate with end up ignoring or closing me, but a few that I initiated with have actually bothered to take the conversation some distance before bailing or go out with me at least once before emailing that Dear M letter, so there is still something to be said for keeping it an equal opportunity process.

It’s sad that players, liars, and scammers have ruined this resource for us legitimately searching guys who are looking for more than a FWB or hookup.

Go to a department store that has high racks, narrow aises and no evidence of security cameras, and you have the perfect environment for shoplifters to ply their trade.

Make a dating web site where one sex can’t search profiles while the other can…and you have the perfect environment for head-cases, women in denial, liars, self-deceivers and interpersonal deceivers to recon the men they want, and THEN redraft their profiles to manipulate their marks into thinking they’re “perfect” for them.

That’s not dating. That’s manipulation and lying. The oldest technique in the con game is telling your mark whatever they want to hear. Herway facilitates this perfectly.

The film “Must Love Dogs” was all about being honest. Honest with yourself and with the object of your affections. Then entire story and characters were designed to show what happens when people lie to each other and to themselves.

I don’t deny that Herway might produce good results, but overwhelmingly for the women. Not the men. Not by a mile.

There are lots of women out there who are far from well-adjusted, and Herway facilitates the lowest form of dating predation for them.

I give that site 2-4 years before it closes. Seriously, if Hisway existed, it wouldn’t be long before women realized that all the game-players, stalkers and liars found it to be the best place to ply their trade. Find appealing women, redraft your profile to look like the perfect man and exploit women mercilessly.

It’s ghastly, it’s deceitful and it’s a huge step backwards in the effort to civilize the world of romance between men and women.

Most men, especially the ones who make decent money, won’t be willing to be lab rats, they’ll want to take charge and select a women for their lifestyles as well.