<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engage Unites with Kizmeet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross Williams - WhiteLabelDating.com</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/comment-page-1/#comment-253561</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Williams - WhiteLabelDating.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/#comment-253561</guid>
		<description>The idea of friends introducing each other is good - I don&#039;t think that was the problem, it was more due to the implementation by Engage. Trying to differentiate a brand through technical innovation is folly but there is a similar site in the UK doing well with this route - http://www.mysinglefriend.com - particularly in London where a quarter of singles in the UK live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of friends introducing each other is good &#8211; I don&#8217;t think that was the problem, it was more due to the implementation by Engage. Trying to differentiate a brand through technical innovation is folly but there is a similar site in the UK doing well with this route &#8211; <a href="http://www.mysinglefriend.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysinglefriend.com</a> &#8211; particularly in London where a quarter of singles in the UK live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casualencounters.com/blog/</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/comment-page-1/#comment-253184</link>
		<dc:creator>casualencounters.com/blog/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/#comment-253184</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;ll be absorbed and will eventually become like a vestigial organ of kizmeet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;ll be absorbed and will eventually become like a vestigial organ of kizmeet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/comment-page-1/#comment-253001</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/#comment-253001</guid>
		<description>Until I saw Engage I had never seen gender-specific profiles.

@mac, I agree, conflicting messaging. Going from free to paid can be disastrous unless your community is passionate about your service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until I saw Engage I had never seen gender-specific profiles.</p>
<p>@mac, I agree, conflicting messaging. Going from free to paid can be disastrous unless your community is passionate about your service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/comment-page-1/#comment-252308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/#comment-252308</guid>
		<description>&quot;Free to respond and limited time offer to send messages.&quot;
Will they charging for sending messages once offer expires? Or there will be montly fee for premium account? But that would contradict &quot;no monthly fee&quot; statement. Something does not ring the bell here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Free to respond and limited time offer to send messages.&#8221;<br />
Will they charging for sending messages once offer expires? Or there will be montly fee for premium account? But that would contradict &#8220;no monthly fee&#8221; statement. Something does not ring the bell here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temi - Top UK Dating Sites</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/comment-page-1/#comment-252291</link>
		<dc:creator>Temi - Top UK Dating Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/07/engage-unites-with-kizmeet/#comment-252291</guid>
		<description>I wonder why you draw attention to this fact &quot;I worked with Engage on their early site, which was notable because the male and female profiles were different.)&quot; I am a bit new to this industry so pardon me if my question is not very clever.  Is it not standard for make and female profile to be different at all dating sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why you draw attention to this fact &#8220;I worked with Engage on their early site, which was notable because the male and female profiles were different.)&#8221; I am a bit new to this industry so pardon me if my question is not very clever.  Is it not standard for make and female profile to be different at all dating sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 1.363 seconds using disk

Served from: onlinedatingpost.com @ 2010-03-20 20:09:50 -->