<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Facial Coding Change The Dating Game Forever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will the iPad Make Us Better Daters? &#171; Dating online</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-305124</link>
		<dc:creator>Will the iPad Make Us Better Daters? &#171; Dating online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/#comment-305124</guid>
		<description>[...] Will Facial Coding Change The Dating Game Forever? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will Facial Coding Change The Dating Game Forever? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-245675</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/#comment-245675</guid>
		<description>This new apple patent is relevant, cool stuff.

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/18/apple_exploring_motion_tracking_mac_os_x_user_interface.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new apple patent is relevant, cool stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/18/apple_exploring_motion_tracking_mac_os_x_user_interface.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/18/apple_exploring_motion_tracking_mac_os_x_user_interface.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Ardenghi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-245448</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Ardenghi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2009/06/will-facial-coding-change-the-dating-game-forever/#comment-245448</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now imagine ... reviewing online dating profiles to see results and an analysis of how someone visually responded to a series of questions. What we have here is another remarkable tool that could easily make it&#039;s way into future personality matching systems.&quot;


&quot;Will Facial Coding Change The Dating Game Forever?&quot;

The answer is no!
That method depends on the ability of a well trained operator to detect facial expressions and involuntary body language  and classify the types of lies persons tell, so it can not be fully automated.
Imagine if you have to check 100,000 profiles!
Most probably you will discover ALL persons tell lies in some degree!
And how are they going to manage distortion?
Because
Profiling by music preferences to assess personality
video preferences to assess personality
color preferences to assess personality
bookmarks preferences to assess personality
handwriting analysis to assess personality
purchases and buying trends from credit cards to assess personality
and other methods like them
add distortion to the measurement.

The WHOLE precision of that compatibility system will be LESS than any person could achieve searching by his/her own!!! [in the range of 3 or 4 persons compatible per 1,000 persons screened]



It is better to use directly a normative personality test, like the 16PF5 and a high precision quantized pattern comparison method (part of pattern recognition by correlation) to achieve a whole precision of the compatibility system in the range of 3 persons compatible per 100,000 persons screened, 100 times better than any actual online dating site offering compatibility  methods.


Regards,

Fernando Ardenghi. 
Buenos Aires. 
Argentina. 
ardenghifer@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now imagine &#8230; reviewing online dating profiles to see results and an analysis of how someone visually responded to a series of questions. What we have here is another remarkable tool that could easily make it&#8217;s way into future personality matching systems.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Will Facial Coding Change The Dating Game Forever?&#8221;</p>
<p>The answer is no!<br />
That method depends on the ability of a well trained operator to detect facial expressions and involuntary body language  and classify the types of lies persons tell, so it can not be fully automated.<br />
Imagine if you have to check 100,000 profiles!<br />
Most probably you will discover ALL persons tell lies in some degree!<br />
And how are they going to manage distortion?<br />
Because<br />
Profiling by music preferences to assess personality<br />
video preferences to assess personality<br />
color preferences to assess personality<br />
bookmarks preferences to assess personality<br />
handwriting analysis to assess personality<br />
purchases and buying trends from credit cards to assess personality<br />
and other methods like them<br />
add distortion to the measurement.</p>
<p>The WHOLE precision of that compatibility system will be LESS than any person could achieve searching by his/her own!!! [in the range of 3 or 4 persons compatible per 1,000 persons screened]</p>
<p>It is better to use directly a normative personality test, like the 16PF5 and a high precision quantized pattern comparison method (part of pattern recognition by correlation) to achieve a whole precision of the compatibility system in the range of 3 persons compatible per 100,000 persons screened, 100 times better than any actual online dating site offering compatibility  methods.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Fernando Ardenghi.<br />
Buenos Aires.<br />
Argentina.<br />
<a href="mailto:ardenghifer@gmail.com">ardenghifer@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

