<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happened to Jangl?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nt102008</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/comment-page-1/#comment-223657</link>
		<dc:creator>nt102008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/#comment-223657</guid>
		<description>I wonder what happened to Jangl. I came across another similar phone widget. &quot;JingleMe&quot; (http://www.jingleme.com).  â€œJingleMeâ€ has features that address the privacy and the anonymity requirement that is needed in Social Networking space. I never used Jangl - However, JingleMe.Com a similar widget that seem to work flawless for Social Network sites. It has all the call features and controls that I need. JingleMe will allow you to listen to the caller&#039;s name before you accept the call. If you don&#039;t feel like taking the call, you can reject the call and the call will never go thru. You can even block the particular caller. I like the time of day feature. You can set your profile, such that you can accept (or not accept) calls at certain day and time of the week. I liked that feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what happened to Jangl. I came across another similar phone widget. &#8220;JingleMe&#8221; (<a href="http://www.jingleme.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jingleme.com</a>).  â€œJingleMeâ€ has features that address the privacy and the anonymity requirement that is needed in Social Networking space. I never used Jangl &#8211; However, JingleMe.Com a similar widget that seem to work flawless for Social Network sites. It has all the call features and controls that I need. JingleMe will allow you to listen to the caller&#8217;s name before you accept the call. If you don&#8217;t feel like taking the call, you can reject the call and the call will never go thru. You can even block the particular caller. I like the time of day feature. You can set your profile, such that you can accept (or not accept) calls at certain day and time of the week. I liked that feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/comment-page-1/#comment-179740</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/#comment-179740</guid>
		<description>No one actually uses it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one actually uses it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/comment-page-1/#comment-179632</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/06/what-happened-to-jangl/#comment-179632</guid>
		<description>With a couple of the major dating services as clients (each with millions of members) I&#039;m surprised they couldn&#039;t pull this off.  

I guess there are just too many companies offering the same service at a cost that isn&#039;t sustainable for anyone.  

I&#039;m sure in a few years, Verizon or the deep pockets of Google will probably offer some similar VOIP product and put most of the rest out of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a couple of the major dating services as clients (each with millions of members) I&#8217;m surprised they couldn&#8217;t pull this off.  </p>
<p>I guess there are just too many companies offering the same service at a cost that isn&#8217;t sustainable for anyone.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure in a few years, Verizon or the deep pockets of Google will probably offer some similar VOIP product and put most of the rest out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
