<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jersey Background Checks Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seawizard</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-235041</link>
		<dc:creator>Seawizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-235041</guid>
		<description>So, I am curious?  Lets say I start an online dating website, can I reject members from New Jersey?  What if my target market does not live in NJ?  But my dot com is registered in the US and my site is run out of Rio and hosted in Delaware?
Seawizard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I am curious?  Lets say I start an online dating website, can I reject members from New Jersey?  What if my target market does not live in NJ?  But my dot com is registered in the US and my site is run out of Rio and hosted in Delaware?<br />
Seawizard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eHarmony Now Compatible With Gays &#124; XXXBlackBook Online Dating &#124; Sexy Singles Match</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-234544</link>
		<dc:creator>eHarmony Now Compatible With Gays &#124; XXXBlackBook Online Dating &#124; Sexy Singles Match</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-234544</guid>
		<description>[...] wonder if the eHarmony will have to say that it admits gays in 12 point type on the home [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wonder if the eHarmony will have to say that it admits gays in 12 point type on the home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-206533</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-206533</guid>
		<description>Great article though 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexygirlsandwomen.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flinghotties.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article though<br />
<a href="http://sexygirlsandwomen.com" rel="nofollow">Flinghotties.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-149505</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-149505</guid>
		<description>If your looking for a great online dating website check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://flinghotties.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flinghotties&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your looking for a great online dating website check out <a href="http://flinghotties.com" rel="nofollow">Flinghotties</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-145815</link>
		<dc:creator>CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-145815</guid>
		<description>Online dating can be kinda cool. I think social networking sites are geared toward 20 somethings and not a more mature dater. And, there must be thousands of dating sites out on the web. I did some research and found http://www.datingsitedirect.com to be a good place to start. Many sites are just affiliate doorways to other sites. And then some are just riddled with advertising to the point where itâ€™s almost unreadable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online dating can be kinda cool. I think social networking sites are geared toward 20 somethings and not a more mature dater. And, there must be thousands of dating sites out on the web. I did some research and found <a href="http://www.datingsitedirect.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.datingsitedirect.com</a> to be a good place to start. Many sites are just affiliate doorways to other sites. And then some are just riddled with advertising to the point where itâ€™s almost unreadable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EXPOSED</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-144271</link>
		<dc:creator>EXPOSED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-144271</guid>
		<description>I googled the few organization names that were listed on True&#039;s site. (which have been removed from the site now) Not that difficult.  SODA doesn&#039;t give any information just claims 100s of law enforcement agencies and so on, yet not one name or one word from any of these so called supporters and members.  No names, no information, no contacts = Something fishy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I googled the few organization names that were listed on True&#8217;s site. (which have been removed from the site now) Not that difficult.  SODA doesn&#8217;t give any information just claims 100s of law enforcement agencies and so on, yet not one name or one word from any of these so called supporters and members.  No names, no information, no contacts = Something fishy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathleen</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-144139</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-144139</guid>
		<description>Exposed-

Wow, you mentioned that you were not able to find a list of SODA members.  If that is true, how were you able to contact them and ask if they were members?  Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exposed-</p>
<p>Wow, you mentioned that you were not able to find a list of SODA members.  If that is true, how were you able to contact them and ask if they were members?  Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EXPOSED</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-143825</link>
		<dc:creator>EXPOSED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-143825</guid>
		<description>Chris,

You ever find the list of members of SODA? The info you gave sounds and looks like the info posted on www.HerbVest.com. link on Vest site goes to  http://www.true.com/saferdating. Interesting thing about the SODA website. Only one of the links were working and it is misleading. A list of organizations that could lead someone to believe these organization are members of SODA.  I have contacted a few that are listed and they don&#039;t know who True.com or SODA is, nor do they support them.  Also, they are not happy about being used without their knowledge and/or permission.

Interesting change on True.com Background checks seem to have been changed to screen:

&quot;Safety first â€” We&#039;re the only leading online relationship site that screens all communicating members against some of the largest criminal records databases on the Internet.&quot;  

Has anyone else notice the ads True.com has of young girls in tiny bikinis? Most be for Valentine&#039;s Day. Any one else see the conflict of very young girls in bikinis and True.com&#039;s/Herb Vest statement to be safest and provide a wholesome environment for courtship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>You ever find the list of members of SODA? The info you gave sounds and looks like the info posted on <a href="http://www.HerbVest.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.HerbVest.com</a>. link on Vest site goes to  <a href="http://www.true.com/saferdating" rel="nofollow">http://www.true.com/saferdating</a>. Interesting thing about the SODA website. Only one of the links were working and it is misleading. A list of organizations that could lead someone to believe these organization are members of SODA.  I have contacted a few that are listed and they don&#8217;t know who True.com or SODA is, nor do they support them.  Also, they are not happy about being used without their knowledge and/or permission.</p>
<p>Interesting change on True.com Background checks seem to have been changed to screen:</p>
<p>&#8220;Safety first â€” We&#8217;re the only leading online relationship site that screens all communicating members against some of the largest criminal records databases on the Internet.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Has anyone else notice the ads True.com has of young girls in tiny bikinis? Most be for Valentine&#8217;s Day. Any one else see the conflict of very young girls in bikinis and True.com&#8217;s/Herb Vest statement to be safest and provide a wholesome environment for courtship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EXPOSED</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-143816</link>
		<dc:creator>EXPOSED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-143816</guid>
		<description>Chris?,

I don&#039;t hate True.com, however I don&#039;t like the deceptive business practices of Herb Vest. As for the new law it won&#039;t do anything to make online dating safer and there is no way to enforce it either. I believe it gives people a false sense of security and that makes it dangerous!

Also, more information of True.com. Apparently, pink slips are going out and  explanation of termination&#039;s aren&#039;t included. Is this the beginning of the end for True.com? Nobody in their right mind would invest or buy this business. A couple of years ago Vest put out a rumor that Yahoo was interested in True.com. Guess Vest thought that would draw interest..it didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris?,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hate True.com, however I don&#8217;t like the deceptive business practices of Herb Vest. As for the new law it won&#8217;t do anything to make online dating safer and there is no way to enforce it either. I believe it gives people a false sense of security and that makes it dangerous!</p>
<p>Also, more information of True.com. Apparently, pink slips are going out and  explanation of termination&#8217;s aren&#8217;t included. Is this the beginning of the end for True.com? Nobody in their right mind would invest or buy this business. A couple of years ago Vest put out a rumor that Yahoo was interested in True.com. Guess Vest thought that would draw interest..it didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-141789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2008/01/new-jersey-background-checks-legislation/#comment-141789</guid>
		<description>Exposed,

I think your hatred for True.com has once again taken you off the issue at hand. This legislation is a first for online dating and is the beginning of laws meant to protect online daters. You can hate True.com all you want, but even you have to admit that this is a step in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exposed,</p>
<p>I think your hatred for True.com has once again taken you off the issue at hand. This legislation is a first for online dating and is the beginning of laws meant to protect online daters. You can hate True.com all you want, but even you have to admit that this is a step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/18 queries in 2.522 seconds using disk

Served from: onlinedatingpost.com @ 2010-03-20 10:47:40 -->