Vertrue in $800M LBO

by David Evans on March 23, 2007 in Dating Industry Finance

Dating site owners continue to get out of the market while the getting is good. A few more consolidations and it’s going to be a handful of mega-sites and a thousand niches struggling to survive.

In today’s news, it looks like Vertrue has found a buyer, although shareholders are not happy about the price. According to the New York Post:

Internet marketing company Vertrue, operator of the matchmaking site Lavalife, moved to take itself off the market yesterday via an $800 million leveraged buyout led by CEO Gary Johnson and three private equity shops.

The buyout group, which includes J.P. Morgan’s private equity arm, Oak Investment Partners and Rho Ventures, has agreed to pay $48.50 a share for Norwalk, Conn.-based Vertrue.

CEO Johnson stands to make more than $30 million on the deal.

Besides owning Lavalife, Vertrue sells a variety of buyers-club membership programs across the U.S. and Canada, and has been accused of various deceptive marketing practices.

Lavalife is one of the few running on a credit-based system, where members pay to contact other members on a case-by-case basic.

I was looking at Lavalife and checked out Lavalife Magazine. Looks like they have “borrowed” my ProfileDoctor brand name for themselves. I’m in a great mood today, all I’ll say is that Lavalife marketing are not the most original bunch.

    Related posts:

    1. MemberWorks Becomes Vertrue Incorporated
    2. Vertrue Dutch Auction Tender Offer
    3. Vertrue 1Q 05 Financial Results
    4. Lavalife For Sale
    5. Lavalife 4Q05 Investor call

    { 2 comments… read them below or add one }

    Kim Hughes March 26, 2007 at 10:50 am

    Hey David,
    Re: our column Profile Doctor. We weren’t splitting the atom: our members post online “profiles” which our columnist dissects, ergo the Profile Doctor.
    Profile Practitioner just didn’t have the same ring :-)
    Peace out,
    Kim Hughes
    Editor, Lavalife Magazine

    Reply

    David Evans March 26, 2007 at 11:09 am

    Using someone else’s brand is unoriginal to say the least. Especially since I pitched the service to you in the past.

    Reply

    Leave a Comment

    { 1 trackback }

    Previous post:

    Next post: