<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decay of Facebook Relevance Over Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elevatorfactoids</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/comment-page-1/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>elevatorfactoids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The online dating&#160;timeline&#8230;...&lt;/strong&gt;

A great dating site thought starter from  Fred Stutzman via David Evans at onlinedatingpost..
 â€œSituational relevance and the patterns of decay based on the lifecycle of users.â€? Dating sites should take notice of this. A member during the first wee...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The online dating&nbsp;timeline&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A great dating site thought starter from  Fred Stutzman via David Evans at onlinedatingpost..<br />
 â€œSituational relevance and the patterns of decay based on the lifecycle of users.â€? Dating sites should take notice of this. A member during the first wee&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>I think social sites can have a long life as long as they are true to the community they are trying to serve, offer clear benefits and relate to a niche that has intrinsec staying power.

Nothing lasts long when it is offered to people that are just bypassers in a temporary state but if you do the same in a community of members of highly related interests -interests that have a longer shelf life-, then there is no question in my mind that such sites offer a better proposition than just *dating*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think social sites can have a long life as long as they are true to the community they are trying to serve, offer clear benefits and relate to a niche that has intrinsec staying power.</p>
<p>Nothing lasts long when it is offered to people that are just bypassers in a temporary state but if you do the same in a community of members of highly related interests -interests that have a longer shelf life-, then there is no question in my mind that such sites offer a better proposition than just *dating*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/12/the-decay-of-facebook-relevance-over-time/#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>This is why I do not believe social networking sites will replace dating sites. Social networking sites keep people longer but their user base has less use for them over time. A dating site has high turnover in the short term, but people will return when they are single again.  I tend to think that MySpace is a fad that will lose it&#039;s popularity over time as it&#039;s users grow up, and nigerian scammers take over.  The influence that networking sites like MySpace and Friendster will have on dating sites is people will not be willing to pay $25+ to send an e-mail anymore. I think users get real pissed when they have to pay to see who sent them an e-mail. I canceled my American Singles account shortly after they started doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I do not believe social networking sites will replace dating sites. Social networking sites keep people longer but their user base has less use for them over time. A dating site has high turnover in the short term, but people will return when they are single again.  I tend to think that MySpace is a fad that will lose it&#8217;s popularity over time as it&#8217;s users grow up, and nigerian scammers take over.  The influence that networking sites like MySpace and Friendster will have on dating sites is people will not be willing to pay $25+ to send an e-mail anymore. I think users get real pissed when they have to pay to see who sent them an e-mail. I canceled my American Singles account shortly after they started doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

