<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Paid Subscriptions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>Markus, I think your numbers are quite low. A look at recent 10-k&#039;s would make me believe that you&#039;re  low-balling, Match is over 1 million subs, are you saying thats not true? And Spark has 150k between jDate and American Singles, are you saying the other sites only account for 110k paid subs?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markus, I think your numbers are quite low. A look at recent 10-k&#8217;s would make me believe that you&#8217;re  low-balling, Match is over 1 million subs, are you saying thats not true? And Spark has 150k between jDate and American Singles, are you saying the other sites only account for 110k paid subs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Dorofeeva</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Dorofeeva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I assume that there are many singles in Us but I agree with Markus on the &quot;average dater&quot; habit. 



Usually not all members at your site are active and only half of them are in a paid membership.



Thst&#039;s why I personally think that it&#039;s hard to make any real conclusions on the basis of such statistics. And to gather a common database of users is adifficult task as you&#039;ll need to compare their registration and membership state at the Dating Sites.



Besides, it&#039;s impossible due to security reasons of many Dating Sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that there are many singles in Us but I agree with Markus on the &#8220;average dater&#8221; habit. </p>
<p>Usually not all members at your site are active and only half of them are in a paid membership.</p>
<p>Thst&#8217;s why I personally think that it&#8217;s hard to make any real conclusions on the basis of such statistics. And to gather a common database of users is adifficult task as you&#8217;ll need to compare their registration and membership state at the Dating Sites.</p>
<p>Besides, it&#8217;s impossible due to security reasons of many Dating Sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>The number that would really mean something is the ratio of subscribers to profiles on a given site. No chance of that, though. Better to mislead with artificially inflated profile numbers than offer some real quality for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number that would really mean something is the ratio of subscribers to profiles on a given site. No chance of that, though. Better to mislead with artificially inflated profile numbers than offer some real quality for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>I think he is talking about active members not paid subscribers.



Average dater visits 3 sites and pays for 1 site.  Average conversion rate is around 15%  so that means that 45% of daters convert to paid.



Match.com has 800k paid

yahoo    400k paid

eharmony  300k paid

spark  150k  paid 



So ball park of  1.6 million paid subscribers per month  with  over 3 million users looking via social networks, dating sites, free sites etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he is talking about active members not paid subscribers.</p>
<p>Average dater visits 3 sites and pays for 1 site.  Average conversion rate is around 15%  so that means that 45% of daters convert to paid.</p>
<p>Match.com has 800k paid</p>
<p>yahoo    400k paid</p>
<p>eharmony  300k paid</p>
<p>spark  150k  paid </p>
<p>So ball park of  1.6 million paid subscribers per month  with  over 3 million users looking via social networks, dating sites, free sites etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>He got his numbers from craplexa.com. You just enter what you want and out spits a number and a sweet graph.



;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He got his numbers from craplexa.com. You just enter what you want and out spits a number and a sweet graph.</p>
<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Arnott</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Arnott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/11/how_many_paid_subscriptions/#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>Dave,



This seems a little low, but if we are talking paid subscriptions then it may be accurate!?!? There are a lot of people who just set up the profile hoping a paid member will initiate the contact. Just a guess though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>This seems a little low, but if we are talking paid subscriptions then it may be accurate!?!? There are a lot of people who just set up the profile hoping a paid member will initiate the contact. Just a guess though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

