Comments on: AOL Acquires Userplane To Expand Web-Based Chat and IM http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/08/aol_acquires_userplane_to_expand_web-based_chat_and_im/ Online Dating Industry Consulting & Commentary Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Michael Jones http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/08/aol_acquires_userplane_to_expand_web-based_chat_and_im/comment-page-1/#comment-1646 Michael Jones Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:04:58 +0000 http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/08/aol_acquires_userplane_to_expand_web-based_chat_and_im/#comment-1646 Thanks for the Kudos Dave.. I unfortunately can't comment on our revenue or deal numbers. We are staying "Userplane" and will just be expanding our network as we have over the past few years. We hope to bridge into the AIM network to expand the dating site's online-now numbers, and allow more interconnectivity between the desktop user and the logged in web user - which should benefit communications to all communities. Overall we love the industry and are committed to it. If I am not in Amsterdam next month – someone from my team will be in attendance! Thanks for the Kudos Dave.. I unfortunately can’t comment on our revenue or deal numbers. We are staying “Userplane” and will just be expanding our network as we have over the past few years. We hope to bridge into the AIM network to expand the dating site’s online-now numbers, and allow more interconnectivity between the desktop user and the logged in web user – which should benefit communications to all communities.

Overall we love the industry and are committed to it. If I am not in Amsterdam next month – someone from my team will be in attendance!

]]> By: Jeff Clavier http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/08/aol_acquires_userplane_to_expand_web-based_chat_and_im/comment-page-1/#comment-1645 Jeff Clavier Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:45:13 +0000 http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/08/aol_acquires_userplane_to_expand_web-based_chat_and_im/#comment-1645 Dave> It is actually Jon Miller, not John Miller :-). Dave> It is actually Jon Miller, not John Miller :-).

]]>