Online Dating Insider delivers cutting-edge insight and commentary on all aspects of the online dating industry. Topics include industry news, site reviews, emerging trends, analysis of dating site features, discussion about safety safety, finance and other issues important to the online dating market. Don't miss our Startups directory, useful to anyone running dating or social networking sites. Subscribe to the RSS feed (you can subscribe via email as well). Your comments and suggestions for stories are welcomed.
We offer consulting services to dating sites and social networks as well.
Ad Age on talks about singles flocking to Myspace from Match.com. The novelty has worn off and dating sites have not stepped up to the plate with new features to keep up with consumers. BindMindFind and $200 couple’s therapy do not a healthy industry make. Couples counseling is more of a Google Local kind of service, but if you want to pay a dating site more money to stack the deck in your favor, go for it.
Lisa Skriloff states that CL is drawing away daters from traditional sites. Lisa, I don’t see Craigslist taking much away from traditional dating sites, where’s the data to back that assertion up? Unsubstantiated claims drive me crazy.
Then we have Teamdating, where you get to meet their friends and their friends get to meet your friends, or something to that effect. Are people demanding they want to go out on a first date with their friends around? This is new to me.
Good intel: Match.com spent $54.2 million on ads last year, while eHarmony spent $61.6 million, according to TNS Media Intelligence.
More than 1/5 of the entire dating industry revenue went to ads for both companies, and Yahoo wasn’t even mentioned.
Yahoo Personals Premiere had “solid early growth over the past 18 months.” I assume that is shorthand for “early interest has flattened out.”
Jim Safka was telling people that Chemistry.com is “intended to draw in affluent individuals who haven’t online dated before.” I have not heard this “affluent individuals” phrase from Match, Chemistry is Match’s response to eHarmony walking away with their customers, affluent has nothing to do with it. Rich people like to take tests and middle-class rely on intuition?
New advertising campaigns? I haven’t seen them. All my brain registers are Eharmony ads and those Mate1 ads popping up everywhere. I wish for all the money they are spending that Mate1 would make them more memorable. They are advertising for brand impressions, not call-to-action. Big mistake.
Pretty soon people will have their dating site running in their taskbar with presence detection, voice and third-party enhancements like testing and search. We will look back and wonder why we had to actually visit a website to view profiles and search for people. See Meetro as an example.
Technorati Tags: match.com, mate1, teamdating
{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
I guess that thinking has changed?
I conducted a research recently, and wrote an article about it.
Men’s golden rule of online dating - Patience begets Trust.
Basically, I found out that most women are happy to chat online, but wary of meeting offline. So, even though there are tons of single men and women out there, the hookups just aren’t happening.
I think one of the big issues is that the style of dating for guys is generally different than that of girls - we like to chat online and keep things a little anonymous at first, and we have more specific criteria. Men tend to want to jump to the face-to-face meeting not too long after looking at photos.
eHarmony at least forces everyone to go through the same hoops from the start. Too bad it’s mostly women that use it!
I’m sick of online dating because it’s not a natural way to meet people. I want to meet people online the way I do when I am out, and that for the most part is with my friends.