<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Jupiter and GMI Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/thoughts_on_jupiter_and_gmi_research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/thoughts_on_jupiter_and_gmi_research/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: markus</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/thoughts_on_jupiter_and_gmi_research/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/thoughts_on_jupiter_and_gmi_research/#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Here are december numbers for Domain name Searches.
http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/

 Match.com 1,263,083 
 eHarmony.com 162,297
 Americansingles.com 108,759
 Plentyoffish.com 145,811
 Manhunt.net 166,525
 Cupid.com 116,189
 Blackpeoplemeet.com 98,246
 Mate1.com 98,128
 HotorNot.com 46,334 
 TRUE.com 86,488
 Singlesnet.com 81,100
 Perfectmatch.com 37,520

JAN 2006 numbers

 Match.com  1,438,111  +13.9%
 eHarmony.com  226,925 +39.8%
 Plentyoffish.com 172,997 +18.6%
 Manhunt.net 172,505 +0.8%
 Cupid.com 134,111 +15.4%
 Blackpeoplemeet.com  112,041 +14%
 Americansingles.com 113,503 +4.4%
 Mate1.com 118,917 +21%
 Singlesnet.com 95566 +17.8%
 TRUE.com 89,263 +3.2%
 HotorNot.com 50,481 +9%
 Perfectmatch.com 39390 +5%

Jan is the month that dating traffic normally increases 20%.  I think that domain name searches on yahoo etc are a reflection of your brand strength and what the market thinks of your site.

Americansingles,  True and perfectmatch are the big main stream losers.  I can only see 2006 as a year in which they lose major money.  They were unable to capitalise on word of mouth during the dating industries peak season.

&quot;Elliot says only 14% of non-conversions use free sites.&quot;

Look at the canadian market,  Plentyoffish now has over 50% marketshare.  Lavalifes 1 year alexa chart is going straight down.  Mine stays the same as I get people to uninstall the toolbar.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are december numbers for Domain name Searches.<br />
<a href="http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/" rel="nofollow">http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/</a></p>
<p> Match.com 1,263,083<br />
 eHarmony.com 162,297<br />
 Americansingles.com 108,759<br />
 Plentyoffish.com 145,811<br />
 Manhunt.net 166,525<br />
 Cupid.com 116,189<br />
 Blackpeoplemeet.com 98,246<br />
 Mate1.com 98,128<br />
 HotorNot.com 46,334<br />
 TRUE.com 86,488<br />
 Singlesnet.com 81,100<br />
 Perfectmatch.com 37,520</p>
<p>JAN 2006 numbers</p>
<p> Match.com  1,438,111  +13.9%<br />
 eHarmony.com  226,925 +39.8%<br />
 Plentyoffish.com 172,997 +18.6%<br />
 Manhunt.net 172,505 +0.8%<br />
 Cupid.com 134,111 +15.4%<br />
 Blackpeoplemeet.com  112,041 +14%<br />
 Americansingles.com 113,503 +4.4%<br />
 Mate1.com 118,917 +21%<br />
 Singlesnet.com 95566 +17.8%<br />
 TRUE.com 89,263 +3.2%<br />
 HotorNot.com 50,481 +9%<br />
 Perfectmatch.com 39390 +5%</p>
<p>Jan is the month that dating traffic normally increases 20%.  I think that domain name searches on yahoo etc are a reflection of your brand strength and what the market thinks of your site.</p>
<p>Americansingles,  True and perfectmatch are the big main stream losers.  I can only see 2006 as a year in which they lose major money.  They were unable to capitalise on word of mouth during the dating industries peak season.</p>
<p>&#8220;Elliot says only 14% of non-conversions use free sites.&#8221;</p>
<p>Look at the canadian market,  Plentyoffish now has over 50% marketshare.  Lavalifes 1 year alexa chart is going straight down.  Mine stays the same as I get people to uninstall the toolbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/thoughts_on_jupiter_and_gmi_research/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/thoughts_on_jupiter_and_gmi_research/#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ve always said that primary data collection and research was key to any business sector.

The industry still has a way to go before it comes out of this &quot;wild-west&quot; mentality of operations. Numbers are what drives the most successful companies throughout history. Why would Online Dating be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve always said that primary data collection and research was key to any business sector.</p>
<p>The industry still has a way to go before it comes out of this &#8220;wild-west&#8221; mentality of operations. Numbers are what drives the most successful companies throughout history. Why would Online Dating be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

