<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymous Calling, Background checks = FUD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Industry Consulting &#38; Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoannvalensi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311536</link>
		<dc:creator>yoannvalensi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311536</guid>
		<description>Sounds great. 
I will explain you more our service

Can you send me your iPhone UDID (use an app called UDID+) so I cans end you the beta? (yvalensi@gmail.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great.<br />
I will explain you more our service</p>
<p>Can you send me your iPhone UDID (use an app called UDID+) so I cans end you the beta? (yvalensi@gmail.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311534</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311534</guid>
		<description>People do not need to keep control over who is calling them. This is not a problem. Why would I want to call someone without knowing their phone number? I would ask them for their number if I wanted to call them. I don&#039;t see a clear use case here. If anyone can call me, that is going to create the problem of keeping control over who is calling me. You create a problem and then you deliver a solution. Thats kind of interesting but again there are so many &quot;social phonebooks&quot; out there. I&#039;m still not seeing how yours is any different. Sure send me a link to the beta. Best way to learn about something is to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People do not need to keep control over who is calling them. This is not a problem. Why would I want to call someone without knowing their phone number? I would ask them for their number if I wanted to call them. I don&#8217;t see a clear use case here. If anyone can call me, that is going to create the problem of keeping control over who is calling me. You create a problem and then you deliver a solution. Thats kind of interesting but again there are so many &#8220;social phonebooks&#8221; out there. I&#8217;m still not seeing how yours is any different. Sure send me a link to the beta. Best way to learn about something is to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valensi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311529</link>
		<dc:creator>Valensi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311529</guid>
		<description>David,


I have been using Orbitz and checked websites you are reffering to.

I understand your point of view, and it might mean I did not explain kipCall well enough

1) Anonymous: Our applications does not provide anonymous calling: You see the identity of the caller. And you can call him back. We want to get rids of phone number as we think it is useless and permanent, while the usage of Facebook allows you to keep control over who is calling you. 


2) it is mobile and not connected: Unlike other applicationss, our system is always on, no 3G or WIFI required. You just your need your iphone


The big difference with our system is that you will be able to call someone without asking him his phone numbers, and that people will now have the capacity to manage calls the same way they are managing other parts of their social lifes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I have been using Orbitz and checked websites you are reffering to.</p>
<p>I understand your point of view, and it might mean I did not explain kipCall well enough</p>
<p>1) Anonymous: Our applications does not provide anonymous calling: You see the identity of the caller. And you can call him back. We want to get rids of phone number as we think it is useless and permanent, while the usage of Facebook allows you to keep control over who is calling you. </p>
<p>2) it is mobile and not connected: Unlike other applicationss, our system is always on, no 3G or WIFI required. You just your need your iphone</p>
<p>The big difference with our system is that you will be able to call someone without asking him his phone numbers, and that people will now have the capacity to manage calls the same way they are managing other parts of their social lifes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valensi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311518</link>
		<dc:creator>Valensi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311518</guid>
		<description>Hi,


I know Orbit, even if I have not used it a lot. I will spend much time on it. Honnestly, it is quite different, we are really dealing with voice calls, and the question of phone numbers;


David, would you like to download the Beta?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I know Orbit, even if I have not used it a lot. I will spend much time on it. Honnestly, it is quite different, we are really dealing with voice calls, and the question of phone numbers;</p>
<p>David, would you like to download the Beta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311516</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311516</guid>
		<description>My only comment at this time is that this is a highly contested space with 50+ companies trying to do the exact same thing. Some of them are quite good. Look at http://www.launchorbit.com/ for example. I have at least 5 apps on my phone which do this. I hardly use any of them after a few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only comment at this time is that this is a highly contested space with 50+ companies trying to do the exact same thing. Some of them are quite good. Look at <a href="http://www.launchorbit.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.launchorbit.com/</a> for example. I have at least 5 apps on my phone which do this. I hardly use any of them after a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valensi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311515</link>
		<dc:creator>Valensi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311515</guid>
		<description>David,

Of course there might be projects I am not aware of.  But here is the thing:

I do not have the phone numbers and everybody in my Facebook,  and there are not all my actual friends. We do not really aim to change Facebook, but more to change people call. Facebook is the first app.

People exchange now their facebook very quickly, and tend not to exchange phone numbers.

We want to get rids of phone numbers and switch them by a solution that allows people to keep control over time on who can call them, when they are reachable...  Phone numbers do not allow that.

And the system is not anonymous, you know who calls you, you just don&#039;t have his phone number. But you can callback, at any time. And of course, this is mobile.

Available to continue to discuss (better in inbox I guess yvalensi@gmail.com)


Yoann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Of course there might be projects I am not aware of.  But here is the thing:</p>
<p>I do not have the phone numbers and everybody in my Facebook,  and there are not all my actual friends. We do not really aim to change Facebook, but more to change people call. Facebook is the first app.</p>
<p>People exchange now their facebook very quickly, and tend not to exchange phone numbers.</p>
<p>We want to get rids of phone numbers and switch them by a solution that allows people to keep control over time on who can call them, when they are reachable&#8230;  Phone numbers do not allow that.</p>
<p>And the system is not anonymous, you know who calls you, you just don&#8217;t have his phone number. But you can callback, at any time. And of course, this is mobile.</p>
<p>Available to continue to discuss (better in inbox I guess <a href="mailto:yvalensi@gmail.com">yvalensi@gmail.com</a>)</p>
<p>Yoann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311514</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311514</guid>
		<description>I think Facebook, Skype and a few other companies are very close to baking your feature right into our social networks. Anonymous contact on Facebook doesn&#039;t really make much sense. If someone is your friend, sharing number is not a big concern.

For private chat with people you don&#039;t know, there are many companies which offer anonymous calling services.

How are you different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Facebook, Skype and a few other companies are very close to baking your feature right into our social networks. Anonymous contact on Facebook doesn&#8217;t really make much sense. If someone is your friend, sharing number is not a big concern.</p>
<p>For private chat with people you don&#8217;t know, there are many companies which offer anonymous calling services.</p>
<p>How are you different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valensi</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-311511</link>
		<dc:creator>Valensi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-311511</guid>
		<description>Hello guys, hello David


We are about to launch that application, quite different but also in the &quot;calling area&quot;. It is called KipCall, www.kipcall.com

How do you feel about it?

Let me know what you think of it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello guys, hello David</p>
<p>We are about to launch that application, quite different but also in the &#8220;calling area&#8221;. It is called KipCall, <a href="http://www.kipcall.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kipcall.com</a></p>
<p>How do you feel about it?</p>
<p>Let me know what you think of it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>As a practical matter, VoIP is in the early adopter stage. Once there is a critical mass of people with IM clients and the knowledge to use them competently, and once standards are adopted by the industry so that I don&#039;t need different clients to communicate with different buddies, it may well be *the* anonymous voice solution, but in my opinion that is a long way off.
 
As to those sites that allegedly will not allow their clients to send an email address, URL, or other such info to another member via their proprietary mail systems, I cannot speak for all such sites, but I can speak for eHarmony, and I am here to tell you that yes, you *can* send such info, if you know how. I&#039;ve done it on several occasions, and they never blinked an eye.

What I object to are outfits like match.com claiming that messaging via their anonymous remailer is secure when it does not screen message bodies for the actual email address of the sender, this being the default format for messages sent using Microsoft Outlook. I have told several women about this, and all have been both shocked and angry at match.com for giving them a false sense of security.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a practical matter, VoIP is in the early adopter stage. Once there is a critical mass of people with IM clients and the knowledge to use them competently, and once standards are adopted by the industry so that I don&#8217;t need different clients to communicate with different buddies, it may well be *the* anonymous voice solution, but in my opinion that is a long way off.</p>
<p>As to those sites that allegedly will not allow their clients to send an email address, URL, or other such info to another member via their proprietary mail systems, I cannot speak for all such sites, but I can speak for eHarmony, and I am here to tell you that yes, you *can* send such info, if you know how. I&#8217;ve done it on several occasions, and they never blinked an eye.</p>
<p>What I object to are outfits like match.com claiming that messaging via their anonymous remailer is secure when it does not screen message bodies for the actual email address of the sender, this being the default format for messages sent using Microsoft Outlook. I have told several women about this, and all have been both shocked and angry at match.com for giving them a false sense of security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Broadbent</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Broadbent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2006/02/anonymous_calling_background_checks_fud/#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>In theory, I agree with Markus on the idea of VoIP integrated into the IM with the ability to open or close communication to select individuals to be a killer datilng app and a great idea.  But, mass depolyment is a far bigger issue especially when the various IM platforms are purposefully not compatible.  Why hasn&#039;t the videocam taken off?  It seems great - but why is there such small deployment?  I think ubiquitous deployment to make it work on scale will come down to what the Dell&#039;s preload and ship on their computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, I agree with Markus on the idea of VoIP integrated into the IM with the ability to open or close communication to select individuals to be a killer datilng app and a great idea.  But, mass depolyment is a far bigger issue especially when the various IM platforms are purposefully not compatible.  Why hasn&#8217;t the videocam taken off?  It seems great &#8211; but why is there such small deployment?  I think ubiquitous deployment to make it work on scale will come down to what the Dell&#8217;s preload and ship on their computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

