True.com interview with OPW

by David Evans on June 17, 2005 in Dating Sites

Mark Brooks interviews Herb Vest over at Online Personals Watch. A little less fluff than the last interview with PerfectMatch CEO. High point of the interview- Vest now wants dating sites to label their personality tests as “fun” or “serious.” Did I read that right?

True is Mimicking Eharmony’s goal of lowering divorce rates. Vest knows that they will never beat Eharmony at the “serious dating” game. Now they’re going after guys with cleavage shots in all their ads. How is addressing the market for casual dating going to reduce the divorce rate?

Vest is unable to clearly define the difference between True and Eharmony when asked point blank.

He fumbles while trying (I think) to say that True is for less serious daters.

I would like the industry to look at compatibility testing on a more professional level. I’d like to see these tests certified against principles set up by professional psychologists. I think the public is going to wake up and feel duped unless we conform to professional standards.

The bickering about scientific matching is getting old. Time to retire that horse, Herb. I welcome an attempt by an industry coalition to form a committee to develop professional standards for matching, testing, etc but it’s most certainly not going to start with True. The industry wouldn’t stand for it.

Why does the industry need parity in testing? Each site is free to interpret how people measure up to potential mates, that’s what gives each site it’s own personality.

I wish Dr. Mark at WeAttract would chime in on this. I am a big fan of their tests, the user experience is superb, fun to take and informative, you really learn something about yourself at the end. And, their results are directly integrated into Yahoo! Personals search results. Thomas and some other companies are coming on strong as well, expect new tests to show up on dating sites over the next few months.

The final kicker- Vest now identifies True as a relationship company. They have plans to enter European market. They’re going to introduce pre-marriage counseling, self-help guides and conflict resolution services. That’s a lot of new ground to cover and I don’t see the benefit of offering services like that as a way to increase their customer base.

The True-Eharmony-PerrfectMatch battle rages on. Spark is quiet due to their quiet period, not that they would jump into the fray. FriendFinder doesn’t bother getting involved with these situations, better to keep raking in the cash and letting their competitors shoot themselves in the foot.

It will be interesting to see what happens with Relationship Exchange as the merger progresses.

Lot’s of site are on the block, people know it’s time to get out before the going gets tougher. Customer acquisition deals are on the rise for those with the stamina and funding to make go of it . A few new services are launching soon, some of which will fundamentally change how introduction services work.

Should be an interesting summer for those that can weather the lean months.

    Related posts:

    1. True.com: Hot but Virtuous
    2. True.com’s Pert Advertising
    3. True lobbying efforts
    4. Match and True outgrowing their digs
    5. Forbes Interviews True.com Founder

    { 2 comments }

    Fernando Ardenghi June 18, 2005 at 8:04 pm

    “Online dating industry coalition to form a committee to develop professional standards for matching, testing, etc”

    Actually many online dating sites invented a proprietary test to measure personality and a way to compare and assign a compatibility percentage between profiles.
    -eHarmony uses a proprietary test, invented by Dr. Neil Clark Warren (psychologist), only English for USA.
    -Match and YahooPersonals! use WeAttract’s proprietary test, invented by Dr. Mark Thompson and Dr. Glenn Hutchinson (psychologists) Adapted MBTI model, only English for USA.
    -Tickle uses a proprietary test only English for USA, invented by Plumeus Inc (Canada).
    -PerfectMatch uses a proprietary test, invented by Dr. Pepper Schwartz (sociologist) Adapted MBTI model, named DUET method, only English for USA.
    -Cybersuitors uses a proprietary test, invented by Dr. Glenn Wilson, only English for UK.

    -True uses a proprietary test, invented by Dr. Jim Houran (psychologist) Adapted Rasch model, only English for USA.

    True.com has its proprietary test independently certified to meet the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (its proprietary compatibility test uses an adapted Rasch model as it could be seen in TCT Manual)
    http://www.true.com/images/tctmanual.pdf?svw=footer

    As I could understand True.com HAS NOT any certificate about MARITAL STATUS SATISFACTION and STABILITY PREDICTORS in its proprietary compatibility test.

    There are a lot of tests that meet Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing:

    Some Examples
    Personality:
    IPAT’s 16PF5 in different languages from http://www.16pfworld.com
    CPpro from http://www.computerpsychologist.com/tcp2000/prodserv.htm
    IPIP 16PF5 from http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/ Dr. Lewis Goldberg, Oregon Research Institute
    15FQ+ from http://www.PsyAsia.com
    FiT In from http://www.hrobjective.com

    Intelligence.
    Raven Matrices
    WAIS

    Other tests:
    Zulliger Test
    Rorschach Test
    House Tree Person from Buck-Hammer
    Person under the rain test, used to measure how aggressive a person could be in some situations.
    Bender-Gestalt test (used to test Driver’s License applicants in Argentina)
    But these last five could not be computer automated, although there are Typical Answers

    Mostly they are used to match job applicants to a job (the 3 or 4 persons who best fit a position).
    They also could be used to match persons, online dating. The main problem is how to solve the matching algorithm.
    Many Single_But_Not_Alone persons are not interested in marriage satisfaction and stability predictors, only in contacting predictable persons, quality contacts, reliable people.

    Kindest Regards,
    Fernando Ardenghi.
    Argentina.
    ardenghifer@gmail.com

    Dave Evans June 20, 2005 at 9:41 am

    I think Vest wants to to standardize on testing methodoligies. There are many to choose from as you point out.

    I don’t think Tickle tests should be mentioned along side relationship tests from the major dating sites. Like comparing apples to oranges.

    Comments on this entry are closed.

    Previous post:

    Next post: