Online Dating Insider delivers cutting-edge insight and commentary on all aspects of the online dating industry. Topics include industry news, site reviews, emerging trends, analysis of dating site features, discussion about safety safety, finance and other issues important to the online dating market. Don't miss our Startups directory, useful to anyone running dating or social networking sites. Subscribe to the RSS feed (you can subscribe via email as well). Your comments and suggestions for stories are welcomed.
We offer consulting services to dating sites and social networks as well.
From Yahoo News: Friendster logged 703,000 visitors to its site in April, a 15 percent drop from the year-ago month and the average visitor spent 14 minutes on the site that month, down 65 percent year over year, according to Nielsen/NetRatings. By contrast, MyPlace boasted 8.2 million visitors in April, who spent an hour and 23 minutes on the site.
As Friendster CEO, Sassa has tinkered with offering horoscopes, news headlines and Weblogs to boost the amount of time users spend on the site, a notion called “stickiness” in the dot-com boom of the late 1990s.
Tinkered being the operative word. Site looks much better than it first did but who cares about horoscopes? News headlines? Both features are staples of my.yahoo.com and have been for years. Trailblazing is what is needed not replication.
Look at the configuration screenshot, that’s only one of about 3 screens full of customization options on MySpace.
8.2 million visitors! That’s an incredible number. 83 minutes isn’t as sticky as I would have thought. Heck, I spend 30 minutes at Myspace yesterday customizing my blog and I didn’t even send any hout outs to my peeps. I’m sure people deep into customizing their pages, writing their blogs and actively writing testimonials and networking their bands spend a lot more than 83 minutes a month.
{ 9 comments }
As a MySpace user I’m highly unlikely to click on one of the ads I see. They’re simply not relevant. And I seriously doubt the impact branded ads are having on my purchase plans.
I’m a 29 yr. old male. I decided for giggles to surf MySpace and look at the ads displayed to me. I see the following:
* Banner ad about breast cancer
* Banner ad for True.com (sorry I’m on MySpace. Not interested)
* Banner ad for Alzheimer’s
* Google-like ads for a limo service
* Ad for Jamster (a music service) (hmmm possible interest)
* Ad for monster.com
Many others that have no relevance to me. It’s obvious that people advertise just for the page views. This raises another point. I’m sure I’m not alone here. My eyes tend to glaze over the ad locations and go to the content I’m interested in.
Just because an ad shows up on a page doesn’t mean it even registered in a user’s brain. Now if you were to move the ad around the page a person would have to adapt to find the valuable content and be forced to look at some ads. This would make for a pooer interface and dissatisfied customers.
Unfortunately, advertisers in a lemming like mentality are paying for these impressions. And MySpace wanting to increase revenue will certainly not decline advertiser money if the content is not relevant to its users. No one is stopping to think that the emperor has no clothes.
In short, I think advertisers are overpaying and not receiving the value they perceive they are. There will be a fallout from this when the industry realizes this fact.
>>>ibm thought no one would buy a pc
…when the average teen can be a global marketeer, through ebay, who CARES what the emperor is wearing…that’s so ….history…
…CONTENT is what sells…myspace sells the kids on the ability to “be famous with 5000 friends “…at least online… tom knew that in the beginning…. as soon as tom charges even a dollar a year, he will start his decline…
how about “be in your own movie” as a toy to sell to kids next? starting with a 5 minute short…a few photos, some CG, a little rendering. wow, everything from naughty naughty to live-on-stage, ….
hmm, we DO need better toys i think…
However, I don’t feel banner ads are an effective way of doing this. I agree that MySpace is a valuable service. I just feel the business model is just not sustainable once advertisers wise up to its ineffectiveness.
I’m a CollegeClub.com veteran, we were social networking before anyone knew what social networking was. We didn’t need online marketing to attract visitors, we didn’t need mass media to attract students. Viral growth was due in part to the fact that our site was the most amazing product available. It rivals many current sites, in features and functionality.
One component that our business had failed on was a solid revenue model. Millions of dollars of venture capital slipped through our hands and lined the pockets of the higher ups but little went into creating a revenue model that would allow the site to sustain itself on a model that didn’t depend on impressions, page views and ad space.
The concept was revolutionary it still is today. However, we’re seeing that Friendster may fall to the same fate. MySpace as cool as it is will soon follow suit.
It does feel like 2000 all over again.
Look, fortunes aren’t necessarily made overnight. A great website and marketing plan was all it took in 1999, today we have to expect more from businesses. I know a thing or two about turning a profit, if MySpace or Friendster would like some pointers, I’d be glad to pitch in a few hints.
Their draw is young music fans. Fans that buy t-shirts, CD’s concert tickets, Special Edition DVD’s and other related products and services that other sites never, or failed to, market to members and visitors.
MySpace is learning from the mistakes that sites such as MP3.com made when they failed to create a sustainable comunity around music and it’s culture. Today’s sites have many new features, technologies and hooks into mass culture as well as more demanding consumers to cater to. MySpace may falter down the line but they have a short-term winner on their hands. The lessons learned from MySpace can be filed under social networking version 2. There will always be a new version but to say they will lose members as Friendster has doesn’t jive with me given the trajectory, emerging business model and related businesses in the Intermix network. Friendster has no partner network to speak of.
What specifically is MySpace doing that makes it’s marketing effort different?
Comments on this entry are closed.