Comments on: WeAttract follow-up http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2005/04/weattract_follow-up/ Online Dating Industry Consulting & Commentary Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:12:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Fernando Ardenghi http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2005/04/weattract_follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-189 Fernando Ardenghi Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:00:13 +0000 http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2005/04/weattract_follow-up/#comment-189 It is easy to see that there are excellent personality tests available in different languages, like 16PF5 16 personality factors, in: Danish, Dutch, English for Australia, English for Canada, English for the United Kingdom, English for the United States, French (European), German, Greek, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese (European and New World), Portuguese of Brazil, Spanish (Castilian), Spanish-American, Swedish & Turkish. coming soon: Chinese, English for South Africa, Finnish, Japanese. source: www.16pfworld.com/languages.html The 16PF5 was invented by Dr. Raymond Cattell in 1949! Proved in millions of persons over the world and actualized using census 2000 figures. OVER 50 years of experience!!! Different personality possibilities: 1 x 10raised_to16, more than persons exist in the world, that are nearly 6 x 10raised_to9. The main problem to solve IS NOT to design personality tests for dating. The main problem to solve IS TO invent a precise way / method to COMPARE the results of the tests between each others. LIKE THIS: Client #01 ---- 16PF5 Profile Results 6.7.6.8.9.6.7.7.8.7.2.5.8.7.3.4 PERSONALITY PATTERN -- Client #02 ---- 16PF5 Profile 5.7.4.8.7.4.5.6.4.6.8.9.6.8.4.4 --- Client #03 ---- 16PF5 Profile 2.5.4.6.3.8.7.6.3.9.9.8.2.5.5.6 --- Client #04 ---- 16PF5 Profile 7.7.6.8.8.7.6.5.8.7.4.5.7.7.3.4 --- Client #05 ---- 16PF5 Profile 4.9.5.4.1.3.4.9.7.8.7.5.6.7.9.10 --- How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #02? == 74.79865772% (Using LIFEPROJECT method algorithm) How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #03? == 54.09395973% How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #04? == 92.55033557% How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #05? == 57.71812081% As it could be seen, the comparison method IS NOT a problem of psychology knowledge, it is only a problem of advanced applied math equations (an engineering problem). Kindest Regards, Fernando Ardenghi. Buenos Aires. Argentina. ardenghifer@argentina.com LIFEPROJECT method DOES NOT apply Regression Weights Method NOR Band Method with optimal range of sten (standardized tens) scores. LIFEPROJECT method DOES NOT USE Myers-Briggs Type Indicators. LIFEPROJECT method uses advanced math equations, condensed in an algorithm, to compare the results with high precision. It is easy to see that there are excellent personality tests available in different languages, like 16PF5 16 personality factors, in: Danish, Dutch, English for Australia, English for Canada, English for the United Kingdom, English for the United States, French (European), German, Greek, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese (European and New World), Portuguese of Brazil, Spanish (Castilian), Spanish-American, Swedish & Turkish. coming soon: Chinese, English for South Africa, Finnish, Japanese.
source: http://www.16pfworld.com/languages.html
The 16PF5 was invented by Dr. Raymond Cattell in 1949! Proved in millions of persons over the world and actualized using census 2000 figures. OVER 50 years of experience!!!
Different personality possibilities: 1 x 10raised_to16, more than persons exist in the world, that are nearly 6 x 10raised_to9.

The main problem to solve IS NOT to design personality tests for dating.
The main problem to solve IS TO invent a precise way / method to COMPARE the results of the tests between each others.
LIKE THIS:
Client #01 —- 16PF5 Profile Results
6.7.6.8.9.6.7.7.8.7.2.5.8.7.3.4 PERSONALITY PATTERN
–
Client #02 —- 16PF5 Profile
5.7.4.8.7.4.5.6.4.6.8.9.6.8.4.4
—
Client #03 —- 16PF5 Profile
2.5.4.6.3.8.7.6.3.9.9.8.2.5.5.6
—
Client #04 —- 16PF5 Profile
7.7.6.8.8.7.6.5.8.7.4.5.7.7.3.4
—
Client #05 —- 16PF5 Profile
4.9.5.4.1.3.4.9.7.8.7.5.6.7.9.10
—

How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #02?
== 74.79865772% (Using LIFEPROJECT method algorithm)

How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #03?
== 54.09395973%

How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #04?
== 92.55033557%

How similar is personality pattern of Client #01 compared to Client #05?
== 57.71812081%

As it could be seen, the comparison method IS NOT a problem of psychology knowledge, it is only a problem of advanced applied math equations (an engineering problem).

Kindest Regards,

Fernando Ardenghi.
Buenos Aires.
Argentina.
ardenghifer@argentina.com

LIFEPROJECT method DOES NOT apply Regression Weights Method NOR Band Method with optimal range of sten (standardized tens) scores.
LIFEPROJECT method DOES NOT USE Myers-Briggs Type Indicators.
LIFEPROJECT method uses advanced math equations, condensed in an algorithm, to compare the results with high precision.

]]> By: Patrick Marshall http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2005/04/weattract_follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-188 Patrick Marshall Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:28:54 +0000 http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2005/04/weattract_follow-up/#comment-188 There is a growing demand for affordable, relevant assessment tools - not just for small niche sites, but for all dating and social networking sites. That said, not everyone wants or needs "Cadillac" functionality. It's tough parking a Caddy when your development roadmap has gridlock. Sites want code that is easy to deploy (under a week), relevant to member's goals (finding a mate faster) and most importantly, adds revenue. It's true that assessment is increasingly becoming standard practice but it shouldn’t be viewed as "a cost of doing business". Done right, assessment can often be the deciding factor on whether a member pulls out his/her credit card and becomes a subscriber. There is a growing demand for affordable, relevant assessment tools – not just for small niche sites, but for all dating and social networking sites. That said, not everyone wants or needs “Cadillac” functionality. It’s tough parking a Caddy when your development roadmap has gridlock. Sites want code that is easy to deploy (under a week), relevant to member’s goals (finding a mate faster) and most importantly, adds revenue. It’s true that assessment is increasingly becoming standard practice but it shouldn’t be viewed as “a cost of doing business”. Done right, assessment can often be the deciding factor on whether a member pulls out his/her credit card and becomes a subscriber.

]]>