iDate presentations

by David Evans on January 27, 2005 · 1 comment

in Conferences

Online Dating Insider delivers cutting-edge insight and commentary on all aspects of the online dating industry. Topics include industry news, site reviews, emerging trends, analysis of dating site features, discussion about safety safety, finance and other issues important to the online dating market. Don't miss our Startups directory, useful to anyone running dating or social networking sites. Subscribe to the RSS feed (you can subscribe via email as well). Your comments and suggestions for stories are welcomed.
We offer consulting services to dating sites and social networks as well.

Several people have expressed interest in providing their iDate presentations to Online Dating Insider readers. Check back often, I’ll post them as they are received. If you would like me to provide a link to your presentation, email it to me with any special instructions.

Presentations

Date.com - Download (PDF)
Trufina - Download (PPT)
Relationship Exchange -
Download (PPT)
Userplane - Download (external link)
Soho digital - Download (PPT)
Did-it.com - Download (PPT)
comScore - Download (external link)

{ 1 comment }

Fernando ArdenghiNo Gravatar 01.27.05 at 8:41 pm
new on line dating and social networking method

Actually, many SAME online dating sites invented a proprietary test to measure personality and a way to compare and assign a compatibility percentage BETWEEN profiles.

I have invented a new on line dating and social networking method named LIFEPROJECT. This method uses a well know personality test instead, in DIFFERENT LANGUAGES, like 16PF5 (or similar). I have not invented a proprietary test, I have invented a HIGH PRECISION, HIGH RELIABILITY WAY TO COMPARE the report of the personality test of one client to others. (2 integers + 8 decimals)

LIKE THIS:
Name: Carol Doe, U.S. Citizen / sex: Female / age: 32 / test date: 25 October 2004
Norm: English US Combined 16PF5 Profile 16 personality factors
(A)Warmth : 6
(B)Reasoning : 7
(C)Emotional Stability : 6
(E)Dominance : 8
(F)Liveliness : 9
(G)Rule-Consciousness : 6
(H)Social Boldness : 7
(I)Sensitivity : 7
(L)Vigilance : 8
(M)Abstractedness: 7
(N)Privateness : 2
(O)Apprehension : 5
(Q1)Openness to Change : 8
(Q2)Self-Reliance : 7
(Q3)Perfectionism : 3
(Q4)Tension : 4
………………………….
Name: André Montagn, French Citizen / sex: Male / age: 39 / test date: 29 December 2004
Norm: French Language 16PF5 Profile
(A)Warmth : 5
(B)Reasoning : 7
(C)Emotional Stability : 4
(E)Dominance : 8
(F)Liveliness : 7
(G)Rule-Consciousness : 4
(H)Social Boldness : 5
(I)Sensitivity : 6
(L)Vigilance : 4
(M)Abstractedness: 6
(N)Privateness : 8
(O)Apprehension : 9
(Q1)Openness to Change : 6
(Q2)Self-Reliance : 8
(Q3)Perfectionism : 4
(Q4)Tension : 4
………………………….
Name: Helmut Fritz, German Citizen / sex: Male / age: 42 / test date: 07 January 2005
Norm: German Language 16PF5 Profile
(A)Warmth : 2
(B)Reasoning : 5
(C)Emotional Stability : 4
(E)Dominance : 6
(F)Liveliness : 3
(G)Rule-Consciousness : 8
(H)Social Boldness : 7
(I)Sensitivity : 6
(L)Vigilance : 3
(M)Abstractedness: 9
(N)Privateness : 9
(O)Apprehension : 8
(Q1)Openness to Change : 2
(Q2)Self-Reliance : 5
(Q3)Perfectionism : 5
(Q4)Tension : 6
……………………………..
Name: Carlo Giulio Mazzini, Italian Citizen / sex: Male / age: 35 / test date: 09 January 2005
Norm: Italian Language 16PF5 Profile
(A)Warmth : 7
(B)Reasoning : 7
(C)Emotional Stability : 6
(E)Dominance : 8
(F)Liveliness : 8
(G)Rule-Consciousness : 7
(H)Social Boldness : 6
(I)Sensitivity : 5
(L)Vigilance : 8
(M)Abstractedness: 7
(N)Privateness : 4
(O)Apprehension : 5
(Q1)Openness to Change : 7
(Q2)Self-Reliance : 7
(Q3)Perfectionism : 3
(Q4)Tension : 4
……………………………..
Name: Inacio Nascimento, Brazilian / sex: Male / age: 47 / test date: 15 January 2005
Norm: Portuguese Language 16PF5 Profile
(A)Warmth : 4
(B)Reasoning : 9
(C)Emotional Stability : 5
(E)Dominance : 4
(F)Liveliness : 1
(G)Rule-Consciousness : 3
(H)Social Boldness : 4
(I)Sensitivity : 9
(L)Vigilance : 7
(M)Abstractedness: 8
(N)Privateness : 7
(O)Apprehension : 5
(Q1)Openness to Change : 6
(Q2)Self-Reliance : 7
(Q3)Perfectionism : 9
(Q4)Tension : 10

COMPARISON
BETWEEN Carol Doe, U.S. Citizen (New York) AND André Montagn, French Citizen (Paris)
== 74.79865772% PROBABILITY OF BEING COMPATIBLE

BETWEEN Carol Doe, U.S. Citizen (New York) AND Helmut Fritz, German Citizen (Bonn)
== 54.09395973% PROBABILITY OF BEING COMPATIBLE

BETWEEN Carol Doe, U.S. Citizen (New York) AND Carlo Mazzini, Italian Citizen (Torino)
== 92.55033557% PROBABILITY OF BEING COMPATIBLE

BETWEEN Carol Doe, U.S. Citizen (New York) AND Inacio Nascimento, Brazilian (Brasilia)
== 57.71812081% PROBABILITY OF BEING COMPATIBLE

The on line dating future: Quality like off line chains, perhaps less photos, less instant messages, less chat, less videos, less speed; high reliability and high precision in on line dating techniques, creating demand of the service.
LIFEPROJECT METHOD is a DISRUPTIVE ALGORITMH that will allow to build an online dating data base that NEVER EXPIRES, because the personality is like a fingerprint. In LIFEPROJECT a person only contacts other persons that have been selected by the algorithm.

A new niche market :
- persons that have been hurt in their feelings by others in many on line dating sites.
- persons that are SEARCHING for a multicultural on line dating. (e.g. a German person living in Germany and compatible with a Brazilian person who speaks Portuguese and lives in Australia)
- persons that have time to wait. (perhaps as long as a whole year, or more).

And all of them have the same reason to pay a fee: This fee will work as a barrier to avoid free users, who could hurt their feelings.

Because homophily dominates human attraction == PREDICTABLE PEOPLE

A good article about this question:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://web.media.mit.edu/~atf/papers/chi2004_personals_short.pdf

BACKGROUND
Psychologists for decades have studied what characteristics people notice and seek in potential mates. Brehm et al. and Fisher provide an overview of the following factors in attraction: Proximity and familiarity are two of the most powerful determinants of attraction — those whom we see more often, and whom it is logistically easier to see, tend to seem more attractive (physically and otherwise). Physical attractiveness also plays a prominent role. Almost all cultures consider facial symmetry beautiful in both men and women, but preferences for other characteristics, like waist-to-hip ratio in women, vary somewhat with culture. People also irrationally associate other good characteristics with beauty, presuming pretty people to be smart and socially capable even when this is not the case. People are generally attracted to others who have demographics, attitudes, values, and personality traits similar to their own. (Contrary to the adage that “opposites attract”, homophily dominates human attraction. Most people seek people like them.) Online dating systems provide tremendously powerful tools for identifying people who match you in these traits.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

LIFEPROJECT method DOES NOT USE Myers-Briggs Type Indicators (MBTI) NOR Regression Weights Method NOR Band Method with optimal range of sten (standardized tens) scores.
LIFEPROJECT uses QUANTUM MECHANICS MATH and STATISTICAL EQUATIONS
Different personality possibilities 1 x 10^16 More than persons exist in the world, that are nearly 6 x 10^9

Fernando Ardenghi.
Argentina.
ardenghifer@argentina.com

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Military singles connect at Militarydatingnetwork

Next post: How to reach iDate attendees